There are elements I don't like such as all the pinned and preserved critters but the good stalls outweigh the bad.

Those who indulge in such acts are hardly likely to shout about their 'achievements' from the rooftops are they, Pete? I can't think of a single example either, but I'm sure it's happened.Pete Eeles wrote: I can't think of a single example of this scenario!
Correct. I don't really see how this can be effectively controlled.Pete Eeles wrote:
I think it would be a lot easier to buy livestock online, and there are plenty of opportunities for that!
You can't police it. Trust is the key. But maybe I am more cynical than you.Pete Eeles wrote: So what is "good enough" in your book? Not sure how you can police such things.
Assumptions can be dangerous, as it usually only takes a small minority to bring the entire practice of the majority into disrepute.Pete Eeles wrote:
Actually, I don't think it does, presumably because it assumes that the vast majority of folk are well-intentioned. What it does is what it can do - which is ensure that restrictions on species (as per the law) are enforced.
Yes. 'Comprehensive' doesn't really do it justice. It's positively invaluable.Vince Massimo wrote:I don't think such a comprehensive guide has ever been produced. An excellent piece of work and an essential reference point for all who care about butterflies.
Well done Pete!
My mother didn't like the idea of livestock in the fridge.Tony Moore wrote:When this subject was first mooted, I thought it might open a whole can of caterpillars....![]()
T.M.