

Have a goodun
Wurzel
Funny you should say that... During a break in the rain, I popped out for a quick lunchtime recce, and discovered that I'd left the FZ200 switched on - must have been like that for a couple of days - with the LCD screen closed, and the lens cap on - and, there was still 2/3 battery left. According to the specs, the power consumption difference between the EVF and the LCD screen is quite minimal, but I've noticed that the battery life is much better than my first Panasonic bridge (an FZ7, I think).I'd thought about disabling the time-out, though I can see it is a recipe for flat batteries! A nice thing about the Nikon is that there is no need ever to switch it off, since it automatically powers down to a very low consumption state, while remaining ready for instant action - I often find it left switched on in my bag but it's no problem.
That's very reassuring - perhaps I should be less cautious! I notice that, while there 's an 'LCD-off' timer in the menus, there's no equivalent for the EVF, which perhaps suggests that Panasonic think it unnecessary.jonhd wrote: ... discovered that I'd left the FZ200 switched on - must have been like that for a couple of days - with the LCD screen closed, and the lens cap on - and, there was still 2/3 battery left.
Good luck with that one!MikeOxon wrote:Perhaps, if the rain clears...
I was struck, on my last visit to Otmoor, by how autumnal the vegetation was looking. It seems as though, having started early, the plants have decided they've done enough! In addition, in previous years, I have always associated the appearance of Silver-spotted Skippers as marking the end of the mainstream season, and they were around locally in early July.Wurzel wrote:I was wondering what Shamanic powers you have Mike![]()
Thank you Pauline. If you look closely, you'll see that the Clouded Yellow photo was taken last year, but I included it because it represented exactly how I saw one this year- flitting rapidly across the grass from flower to flower. In addition, I wanted a number of species divisible by three, to fit my format!Pauline wrote:I love the way you've presented your summary Mike. I was looking to do something similar but haven't a clue how. It seems that you might have actually photographed 39?