Wurzel wrote:Cracking shots Philzoid which camera were they taken with? Is the moth the same ond that was on the home page of Butterfly Conservation a while back?
Have a goodun
Wurzel
Thanks Wurzel. The pictures were all taken with the my Canon D1100 with the 50mm close focussing lens .. .starting to get the hang of it now since switching to manual focus and aperture priority. I've found a use for the panasonic:- moth pictures

. Combined with the flash are better than Izzy's compact which is just as well because most of the butterfly pictures taken with it are rubbish
I haven't seen the home page of butterfly conservation so can't say. However there is a good chance it could be that because the Small Ranunculus is a rarity which I believe is making a comeback. My Townsend, Waring and Lewington book says "pRDB SE,SWales,(C)" Manley says "thought extinct fo 50 years before re-appearing in Kent; Essex and South Wales" and my Skinner says "formerley resident, now extinct"
ChrisC wrote:Philzoid,i missed your small ranunculus, that's excellent news, they are spreading well, i caught my first back on July 27th 2002, almost exactly 10 years to the day to yours . in those days it was only just hitting the headlines. and the write up for it in the main moth book back then (skinner) still said extinct. it even made the herts and middlesex moth newsletter lol
" It was inevitable that the moth should spread out along the Thames into, and perhaps through, Middlesex, and so it has done. Chris Court had one in his garden trap at Hayes, Middlesex on 27th July 2002."
I was chuffed to bits. most nights during the flight period they used to come to the teucrium chamaedrys in the garden at dusk.
Chris
Thanks Chris, I just noticed your post as I was scrolling though to quote Wurzel's:- you've answered a lot of questions that were bothering me. Seems like a species that is making a comeback big time.
At the time I'd found it I hadn't realised that significance. Actually I was showing my camera pictures to someone I'd met at Straits Alice Holt and was whizzing through them to get to the Swallow-tailed moths and he said "that's a Small Ranunculus"! As someone who is just really starting to learn about moths I hadn't given it more notice/attention other than something (along with a Nut-tree Tussock) that I was going to have to identify later. I wished I'd taken more photos now.
Catch; photo; catalogue and release is the best way (for me anyway) to learn about the species, or at the very least, be able to identify them. At the moment after 2.5 months on of garden trapping, I've got 80 Macros and around 30 identified Micros (I did intend to just stick with the macros but couldn't help getting onto the micros, especially since a lot of them are much larger e.g. Small Magpie (Eurrhypara hortulata) and Mother of Pearl moths (Pleuroptya ruralis). Trapping is taking its toll unfortunately ... on the trapper

. Quite often I'm half asleep at work
