Bill

That's close enough for me, Bobbadgerbob wrote:........... at Littlington I photographed a Comma which nearly qualifies as an ab. O album. Very similar to the 'comma' marking of the specimen that Vince and myself got at Birling Gap a couple of years ago.
Thanks, Neil.Sussex Kipper wrote:Congratulations David. Emperors on the deck are as rare as rocking horse poo poo this year.
Neil
Incredibly sharp. Quite amazing but almost too sharp - that background shows some noise. I have in the past used superb software called "Noiseware" (I have the free slightly limited version) that smooths noise without any noticeable loss of resolution....did get a few sharp shots
Hi MarkMark Colvin wrote:
By the way your Essex Skipper is a Large Skipper.
Both Essex and Small Skippers are largely uniform on the upperside, whereas Large Skippers have a conspicuous, darker, mottled pattern towards the outer edges. Similarly, the undersides of Large Skippers have a noticeable pattern on them, whereas Essex and Small Skippers are plain.Mildheart wrote: Ah, that would explain something that's been worrying me about the photo. Here is the same insect from the top. I thought Essex could be distinguished by the round-ended antennae, so I was a bit surprised to see hook-shaped antennae characteristic of Small Skipper in the photo, despite the inky-black tips. I thought maybe it was down to wear, since this skipper is fairly fresh, despite some damage at the base of the wings, but I overlooked the obvious solution! Funnily enough, it looked pretty small in the field. I'll change the caption.
Also the sex-brand in the Small is usually slightly curved, whereas the Essex is straighter...?Ian Pratt wrote:Tristan Lafranchis says that the small skipper has a well defined black marginal border whereas the Essex skipper has a balck marginal border which is usually diffuse along the veins. This is clearly shown on the photos above.![]()
Ian