Thanks in advance
Charles

Are you quite sure it was the slides and not the scanner/scanning? I have a bunch of boxes as well and I was not too happy with results from "Minolta DiMage Scan Dual III". If the grain is soft, it shouldn't be the slides, should it?Zonda wrote:The scanner really showed up the quality of those old slides, some that had looked great under a loupe were not very good when viewed on the monitor.
I was quite happy with the 75% keeper rate, and pleasantly surprised at the scan quality. In those days my only method of checking whether or not a slide was sharp involved peering through a loupe on a lightbox. In my case most of the rejects were focusing errors, with a few camera shakes. I grew out of my projector quite quickly, and was shooting with selling in mind. Here is an example of one of the better ones.Are you quite sure it was the slides and not the scanner/scanning? I have a bunch of boxes as well and I was not too happy with results from "Minolta DiMage Scan Dual III". If the grain is soft, it shouldn't be the slides, should it?
I must confess that this is nowhere near any of my spheres of expertise!Thanks for the suggestion Rogerdodge
Are there any particular models to seek out or avoid ?
My Boletus pic above was scanned on an Epson Photo RX520, so if you have some old slides try it. If the slides are of good quality i bet it'll do a good job set to 24 bit colour. Gotta make sure you put the slides in right,,, might need a little trial run.My getting very old, Epson Stylus Photo RX620, have a slide thingy, never used it.