
Shirley
Yes, precisely where I saw them last year. I took the ferry and had wondered if you had made the long trek along the spit and had found them on the way. It's obviously a fragile colony but the boatman told me that 2009 would mark its tenth year so if nothing else, it's a survivor. When I was there, a steady wind was blowing directly from the Isle of Wight so I guess there are regular reinforcements.landward side of the castle
The reason I used it was because I was too lazy. But the boat does give offer good birdwatching on the way....the reason I don't use the ferry is that only tourists use the service...
In my humble opinion I would say that the Hurst Castle Glanville colony is on borrowed time; vigorous grasses are now reasserting themselves and the amount of ribwort plantain has reduced significantly in only a couple of years. the plantain is now confined pretty much to a single patch at one end of the 'meadow'. There shall surely come a point within the next couple of seasons where there is no longer sufficient food plant to support the voracious larvae.geniculata wrote:hi jack,
no sadley the old colony at hordle cliff looks to be no more, and this fresh colony is restricted to the meadow directly on the landward side of the castle.
I had actually feared as much. But the question has to be asked; why/how did it develop into suitable habitat originally? Was it management; was it perhaps a sea incursion that knocked the coarse grasses? After all, the landslips on I of W must suffer from a lot of salt spray; that might be what does the trick. I don't know. But it would be a shame if the Hurst Castle habitat is allowed to deteriorate. Even the casual non-naturalist visitor would surely rather see flowery meadows than a mono-culture of rough grass?Hurst Castle Glanville colony is on borrowed time; vigorous grasses are now reasserting themselves and the amount of ribwort plantain has reduced significantly in only a couple of years.
I agree exactly. If the butterfly is a long way away, and a large species e.g silver-washed fritillary or white admiral I sometimes use the big Canon 300mm F4 IS, although I am aware not everyone can afford that lens! Otherwise Sigma 150m macro with monopod.FISHiEE wrote:Hi Mark,
You may want to try a monopod with the sigma 150. I shoot almost exclusively with that lens on a monopod. Far more stable than handhels and far more flexible than a tripod. I always carry a tripod with me but rarely use it except in the case of exceptionally inactive butterflies.
Well, they're on the wing out here!jackharr wrote:And you never know what else might get blown across from nearby France and Belgium. Chequered Skippers in Kent?![]()
It was a joke as you realised. I believe they occur in the Belgian Ardennes, a mere four hours away as the wind blowsI don't know where the nearest colony in France is, though...
Not for the beginner are they.FISHiEE wrote:The 50D files are big, but when you get everything right the detail is incredible! It does however make the shots where you don't quite nail it stand out for all of the wrong reasons as well!
bugmadmark wrote:Still struggling to get photos close up with the 150mm macro and find I have to use tripod.
So how many more years to go in your case Gary?Stick at it, it could take years before you get a good shot.
Most species are surprisingly sedentary. I've just been browsing Kudrna and there are loads of butterflies crammed against the coasts of Belgium and France just gagging to get across but which are never seen in England - including palaemon and dia. I think Queen of Spain is the species to watch out for. Although it never manages to become resident in England it is now a fairly regular (but rare) immigrant and the spring brood has been on the wing some time now.jackharr wrote:But is Weaver's Fritillary - Clossiana dia an outside possibility? I believe they occur much closer to England.
Any other species?
Add an extension tube to that 300F4 and it's good for the much smaller species tooIan Pratt wrote:I agree exactly. If the butterfly is a long way away, and a large species e.g silver-washed fritillary or white admiral I sometimes use the big Canon 300mm F4 IS, although I am aware not everyone can afford that lens! Otherwise Sigma 150m macro with monopod.FISHiEE wrote:Hi Mark,
You may want to try a monopod with the sigma 150. I shoot almost exclusively with that lens on a monopod. Far more stable than handhels and far more flexible than a tripod. I always carry a tripod with me but rarely use it except in the case of exceptionally inactive butterflies.