Shirley Roulston wrote:O.K Roger,
Here's the deal, I'll grow the dreaded Ragwort and when Defra fine me which believe me it would be a heafty fine you'll it pay for me, thanks

I'll pop over to the field as I haven't finish the clear up and see if I can see the Small Skipper's and I can then take a photo. This my hay field is 7 weeks over due to be cut as least the butterflies enjoyed it, the field has a wonderful spread of Bird's Foot Trevoil, spread like mad it did.
This is a bit frustrating because these kinds of statements seriously undermine the conservation work that I and others are trying to do. Like a lot of landowners you have been lied to and misled by people with an axe to grind and money to make. What you and others are saying is simply not true. THERE IS NO LEGAL OBLIGATION ON LANDOWNERS OR COUNCILS TO CONTROL RAGWORT. Some vested interests with some hysterically bad statistics tried to get this into law when they failed they go around telling everyone the law changed anyway. You can under extreme circumstances be ordered to control it like in extreme circumstances you can be ordered to keep your kids off the street. You will not be fined for having ragwort on your land.
I have made a very very thorough study of the scientific literature and of the false opinions that landowners hold as a result
of certain people with money to make or a cause to promote and others that are naive with regards to the scientific method.
The plant is poisonous but all the properly conducted studies say the same thing. Poisoning is uncommon.
One French study actually involved deliberately poisoning animals because of the thought that French ragwort might be invisibly different and non-toxic. THEY COULD NOT FIND A SINGLE EXAMPLE IN THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.
A later study found some but only six cases in around a decade.
The plant does sometimes need controlling but now we have a bunch of people scaring people with made up myths.
The seeds do not spread more than a matter of metres from the parent plants so all the letters in the press about it on road verges are nonsense. Most of what you will see in the press is completely made up and repeated from one or two dubious sources.
It is not the yellow peril people are being led to believe. The chemicals which can cause problems ARE PRESENT IN 3% OF THE WORLD'S PLANTS. The only reason we have all this fuss about ragwort is because of campaigners saying silly things.
Please believe me. I have scoured the planet for books and scientific papers in order to be able to know what the truth is with certainty.
The consequence of all the campaigning is wildlife sites including SSSI's being managed in a manner which is unsympathetic to the dozens of insects for which ragwort is important. It rarely needs the control efforts that are being made against it.
For further details please see
http://www.ragwortfacts.com
Or this site written by a Dutch horse owner who was a member of a ragwort extermination group until she decided she wanted to prove all the anti-ragwort stories with science. She then discovered no evidence for the stories only myths and
compiled a stunning international array of experts to help her write the site.
http://www.ragwort.jakobskruiskruid.com/