Page 1 of 1
glaciegenita
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:07 pm
by Reverdin
I would like to canvas opinions regarding the following
aurinia photos, and whether they would be seen as
glaciegenita or
debilis or both! I would appreciate thoughts on it's status, and whether species/ subspecies favoured by our peers?

- 1) aurinia Haute Savoie

- 2) aurinia Haute Savoie

- 3) aurinia Simplonpass

- 4) aurinia Nr Zermatt

- 5) aurinia Albula Pass
Re: glaciegenita
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:38 pm
by Padfield
I'd love to help, Paul, but I have no idea what the current orthodoxy is on this. All your pictures fit into the category I call, for convenience, 'debilis', but I am aware this is probably not even a valid name. Glaciegenita is a valid name - but whether it is species or subspecies or even cladal at all are things I don't know at the moment. I hope someone replies citing an authoritative paper so I can get my own taxonomy straight!
Guy
Re: glaciegenita
Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 2:26 pm
by Pieter Vantieghem
As far as I know 'debilis' is the taxon flying in the Pyrenees and 'glaciegenita' is flying in the Alps, however, me to would like to see more literature solving this problem.
Re: glaciegenita
Posted: Sat May 30, 2015 9:48 pm
by Reverdin
thank you Pieter for that further input... I guess as mine are all Alpine, I maybe ought to label them ssp gaciegenita, but seems it would be a good PhD project for someone!!