Page 18 of 38
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:38 pm
by Padfield
Sorry Denise - there was a flurry of posts since I last looked and I missed your suggestion.
You counted 6 legs per insect and so 48 shoes in total. But small tortoiseshells have only 4 functional legs and Dukes have 4 (male) or 6 (female) - hence Pete's query about same-sex couples.
The breakdown is:
Large white - 6 pairs of shoes needed for the couple
Common blue - 6 pairs
Small tortoiseshell - 4 pairs
Duke of Burgundy - 5 pairs
Making 21 pairs in total.
Guy
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:15 pm
by Pete Eeles
True to form, this critter was found in a vile nasa plot to claim that the moon is now a US state.
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:22 pm
by Rogerdodge
Sorry Guy - but the answer has to be just 13 pairs.
If they had bowling shoes on all their feet, how would they carry the bowling ball?
Roger (being a little pedantic)
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:23 pm
by Rogerdodge
Pete
Red Admiral I think?
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:38 pm
by Pete Eeles
Rogerdodge wrote:Pete
Red Admiral I think?
Nope - and I hope the clue isn't too cryptic
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:44 pm
by Padfield
Is this your cynical way of celebrating the APOLLO missions, Pete?
No, I thought not.
Roger, I hadn't fully thought through the complications of butterfly bowling. 13 would certainly be the correct answer if each butterfly used one fewer pair of shoes. Sorry!!!
Guy
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:52 pm
by Pete Eeles
padfield wrote:Is this your cynical way of celebrating the APOLLO missions, Pete?
I never thought of that - but "no". Additional clue - there's an anagram in there
padfield wrote:Roger, I hadn't fully thought through the complications of butterfly bowling. 13 would certainly be the correct answer if each butterfly used one fewer pair of shoes. Sorry!!!
I don't think there's any need to apologise, Guy. The last time I saw a bowling ball moving, apparently of its own accord, a whole bunch of butterflies had "teamed together" - no legs needed, other than to stabilise themselves
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:05 pm
by Denise
valesina?
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:08 pm
by Padfield
That's brilliant, Denise! I feel there must be more, though. Mmm...
Guy
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:57 pm
by Pete Eeles
Nope - Denise has it spot on. I thought I'd pad it out to make a sensible sentence and keep you lot guessing
"Form" was a clue too
Over to you Denise.
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:54 pm
by eccles
Nuts, I almost had it but was trying to work the word 'plot' into the anagram.

Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 5:52 am
by Padfield
Yup, and the last 10 words had me barking up quite the wrong tree too! The hint was in the word 'form'.
It's been pouring with rain here for a couple of days, so I'm glad of the diversion!
Guy
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:13 am
by Denise
davras suenica is not a greek taverna but possibly the most common butterfly in the UK this year.
What is the common name?
Denise
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:24 am
by Pete Eeles
Painted Lady (Vanessa cardui).
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:39 am
by Denise
Over to you Pete.

Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:45 am
by Pete Eeles
I'm rapidly running out - anyway, here goes!
"After taking advice from
http://www.anti-aging.org/, no more disparaging remarks were made about this critter."
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:20 am
by Padfield
Well, if we're allowing American butterflies, that would have to be the gray (sic) hairstreak!
Guy
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:21 am
by Padfield
Or I suppose after treatment it might be our own brown hairstreak.
Guy
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:06 am
by Pete Eeles
No and no
Clue: It's another word play.
Cheers,
- Pete
Re: Daily Quiz
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:37 am
by Rogerdodge
Pete
Grizzled Skipper?