The moon itself is actually a pretty bright target for photography and I used it to set the focus as precisely as I could on my tele-lens. Spot metering indicated an exposure of 1/125s @ f/13, which is what I chose to use from my tripod although, by using a larger aperture, hand-held shots of the moon would be feasible.
I then opened up the aperture and set a shutter speed of 2 seconds in the hope of recording Uranus. I use a remote release for the camera and, since I could not see the faint stars though the viewfinder, simply took a number of shots in what I hoped was the right direction! After converting the RAW images, and using Photoshop to get the best contrast that I could between the stars and the dark background, I compared the results with the sky image displayed by my 'Starry Night' software. I could determine exactly where the camera was pointing, by comparing the star patterns in my images with the software image. I found that, although I had come very close, Uranus had managed to lie just outside the frame in all my photos!!! It was too cold for another go and I revived myself with a mug of mulled wine instead.
Not to be beaten, I had another go this evening (30th December) and chose to use my 90mm macro lens in order to obtain a wider sky field. The macro has a wide aperture (f/2.8 ), so is useful for finding faint stars. The moon had moved further to the east relative to Uranus but I knew that the planet was due South at about 18:30, so took that as my aiming point. I took a series of horizontally panned images and then overlaid them to produce the following composite - this time, success

(Click to enlarge photo) I've added a few star labels to the photo, mainly members of the constellation Pisces. As you can see, Uranus is just one faint dot amongst many.
Mike