
Felix.
But you didn't give us a 96 digit map reference. Shame on youI saw more Red Admirals in one place....
I am going to work out if 96 digits would give a precision smaller than the dimensions of an atom. I won't do it right now, but when I go to bed tonight. Doing silly sums like that sends me to sleep far quicker than does counting sheep.A 96 digit map ref. would take you to the leaf it was perched on.
..in danger of not seeing the tree for the wood, is that ?jackharr wrote:......he would be within 50 metres (in each direction) of that tree at the very worst. Jack
How on earth did that fact pass me by?????By my calculations, a 96 digit Map Ref will refer you to a square of side 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 Meters.
That's 42 noughts.
That's a lot smaller than atom.
It certainly is! It is aproaching a million times smaller than the Planck length, which current theories have as the smallest length over which anything can be known.Rogerdodge wrote: By my calculations, a 96 digit Map Ref will refer you to a square of side 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 Meters.
That's 42 noughts.
That's a lot smaller than atom.
I may, of course, be wrong.
Damn you Roger. How will I get to sleep tonight without a silly sum to work out? I think I'll have to make do with Cava instead.By my calculations, a 96 digit Map Ref will refer you to a square of side 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 Meters.
That's 42 noughts.
The Cornish Audio Visual Archive ??jackharr wrote:Roger:Damn you Roger. How will I get to sleep tonight without a silly sum to work out? I think I'll have to make do with Cava instead.