There is a generally accepted clear difference in the degree of black marking between the first and second brood females in Holly Blues, the latter having markedly more black than the former. I have posted examples of third brood females over the last few years, and several people have asked me recently whether there is any noticeable difference between second and third brood examples. As a consequence I thought I would look at a selection from all three broods and see just what the extremes are. The periods shown for the broods are an approximation, between the first sighting (usually a male) until the last (usually a female).
First Brood: from the end of March until the end of June
The last female seen from this brood was found laying on 30th June As can be seen, these examples cover May to mid-June, though worn individuals were found for another couple of weeks. The first males from the second brood appeared about a fortnight later, in mid-July.
The next post will contain second brood examples, and the final one the third brood.
Dave
Holly Blue: variation in female markings between broods
Re: Holly Blue: variation in female markings between broods
Second Brood: Mid-July to mid-September
DaveRe: Holly Blue: variation in female markings between broods
Third Brood: October-November
What actually determines the degree of black marking is difficult to pin down. The conditions under which the pupa develops are no doubt significant, but these will vary enormously with the only definite factor being that the spring emergence will have spent a relatively long time in cool conditions, and will undergo the period of the year when day-length increases markedly. The other two broods experience a shortening day, not much for the second but much greater for the third.
What it is that triggers the third brood itself, particularly those that appear right into November, is also mysterious. Days are very short, sunshine relatively weak even if the air isn't too cold, and there may even have been a few slight frosts. Why do some pupae not enter hibernation as the majority must?
I hope this has been an interesting study - even if it is not particularly conclusive, it may provide food for thought at least.
Dave
The last 2019 sighting (a male) was on 27th November. Here are some females from November in previous years for comparison in the absence of a 2019 November female.
Looking over the three broods it can be seen that within each there is quite a bit of variety (the various examples all seen on 17th August demonstrate this). Though the general rule remains true that the second has heavier black markings than the first, some of the first nearly approach the second in this respect. What can be seen however, is that the third brood females do not differ particularly from those of the second.What actually determines the degree of black marking is difficult to pin down. The conditions under which the pupa develops are no doubt significant, but these will vary enormously with the only definite factor being that the spring emergence will have spent a relatively long time in cool conditions, and will undergo the period of the year when day-length increases markedly. The other two broods experience a shortening day, not much for the second but much greater for the third.
What it is that triggers the third brood itself, particularly those that appear right into November, is also mysterious. Days are very short, sunshine relatively weak even if the air isn't too cold, and there may even have been a few slight frosts. Why do some pupae not enter hibernation as the majority must?
I hope this has been an interesting study - even if it is not particularly conclusive, it may provide food for thought at least.
Dave
- Pete Eeles
- Administrator & Stock Contributor
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Thatcham, Berkshire
- Contact:
Re: Holly Blue: variation in female markings between broods
Excellent report, Dave!
I feel an experiment coming on

Cheers,
- Pete
Thanks for the confirmation!
My understanding is that the cells that contain the pigments are laid down shortly after the pupa has formed - some aberrations are artificially created by exposing them to extremes of temperature just after the pupa has formed. Since those formed at the end of the year will be in cooler temperatures (on average) than the offspring in the summer, then the environmental conditions (higher temperatures) may be the cause of the differences in colour.
I feel an experiment coming on

With a 3rd brood becoming an increasingly frequent occurrence, and with second broods of other species more regularly appearing, it's almost certainly due to temperature I would suggest.
One of the best this year

Cheers,
- Pete
Life Cycles of British & Irish Butterflies: http://www.butterflylifecycles.com
British & Irish Butterflies Rarities: http://www.butterflyrarities.com
British & Irish Butterflies Rarities: http://www.butterflyrarities.com
Re: Holly Blue: variation in female markings between broods
Thanks for this, Dave. Extremely interesting. I presume these findings are borne out on the continent where third brood Holly Blues are commonplace.millerd wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 12:34 pm..Though the general rule remains true that the second has heavier black markings than the first, some of the first nearly approach the second in this respect. What can be seen however, is that the third brood females do not differ particularly from those of the second.
As you have found, the main distinction is between the spring brood and the first summer brood.
Perhaps time spent in the pupa plays a role?