Search found 4 matches
- Sun Dec 25, 2011 1:10 pm
- Forum: Photography
- Topic: Macro lenses - which focal length?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 882
Re: Macro lenses - which focal length?
Merry Christmas Everybody - thanks for your thoughts on focal length. The Sigma 150mm becomes 240mm on my Canon D-SLR; minimum focus is 38cm compared with the 30cm minimum focus of the Canon 100mm (being my other option/choice - I had the Nikon equivalent) which becomes 160mm. There were occasions w...
- Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:34 am
- Forum: Photography
- Topic: Macro lenses - which focal length?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 882
Macro lenses - which focal length?
Many thanks to those who responded to my question regarding the advantages of IS/VR/OS on macro lenses. I would appreciate your thoughts on which focal length macro is the more practical for butterfly photography - i.e. 100mm f2.8 or 150mm f2.8 (APS-C camera); handheld or tripod mounted. Thanks
- Thu Dec 08, 2011 3:37 pm
- Forum: Photography
- Topic: Optical Stabilisation - is it helpful?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 795
Re: Optical Stabilisation - is it helpful?
Thanks to everybody who has responded to my question. Clearly, IS (I currently use Canon) is intended to help reduce camera shake when shooting handheld. From practice, from what I have read and from discussions with fellow butterfly enthusiasts that IS not essential. Even the slightest breeze can c...
- Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:57 pm
- Forum: Photography
- Topic: Optical Stabilisation - is it helpful?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 795
Optical Stabilisation - is it helpful?
Is IS/OS/VR of any help or of any value when taking photographs of butterflies 'handheld'?