Butterfly Conservation is a registered charity with a national membership of 11,500. The Society is dedicated to the conservation of butterflies, moths and their habitats.
Butterfly taxonomy (classification) The skippers The swallowtails The whites The hairstreaks, coppers and blues. Includes the Duke of Burgundy. The nymphalids, fritillaries and browns. Includes the Monarch.

Thoughts on Butterfly Photography

by Peter Eeles, 8th April 2005. Updated 9th October 2005.


Some Background

I've been interested in entomology (yes, moths and other insects too!) from about the age of 8. That was, indeed, a very long time ago. A childhood spent growing up in rural Gloucestershire, and the plethora of wildlife that surrounded me, has clearly influenced the lifelong fascination I've had with butterflies. Ever since I can remember, there's always been a jam jar containing "something" in the house every summer.

Even during my teenage years, when I was at my most troublesome (according to my mum!), I still maintained an interest in butterflies. And that interest has never waned. Even now, many years later, married with 3 sons (the eldest is 18 this year!), I still have the odd jam jar on the window sill ... and foodplants growing in the garden (my wife is aware of some - but not all!) ... and "weeds" in selected areas of the garden. They're all there for a reason.

Until relatively recently, I was never that "hooked" on photography. I had a very old SLR that my dad bought for me for my 15th birthday, together with a close-up adapter that fitted on the front of the lens, but that was it. I remember using it to photograph the commoner species, and still have photos taken with it, including Orange-Tip, Puss Moth, Emperor Moth and the like.

The Move to Digital

My chosen career in computing ensured that I had no fear of technology - although I appreciate some people do (and I still don't know how to work the video recorder, but my 3 sons help me out on that front). In 2002 I bought my first digital camera - an "Olympus 2040 Zoom" model. A whopping 2.1 megapixels resolution (non-digital SLRs given about 11 megapixels resolution!). But within 2 days I was hooked. The experience was so different from my old camera, for reasons that are well-documented:

  • I saw my pictures instantly.

  • I could take as many pictures as I liked.

  • The overall quality of my pictures was better (because I took more, and binned those that were rubbish!).

A number of the photos on this website are taken with that camera, even though it would be considered "dated" and inferior by today's standards. Since this website is "self-improving" (the best contributions always take precedence), these will disappear over time. Here's a photo of an Adonis Blue taken with this camera. Click on the thumbnail for a larger image.

My First (and Current) Digital SLR

In 2004 I took a trip to the US and, attracted by the exchange rate, decided to buy my first digital SLR - a Canon EOS 10D (6 megapixels). Although this model was superseded by the Canon EOS 20D in late 2004, it's still a nice piece of kit and absolute bargains can be found on eBay and the like. I also bought a Sigma 100mm macro lens (which is superb) and later purchased a Canon macro flash unit to complete the kit.

Just so that you can see the difference in quality (although this is difficult on a website, where the images are deliberately of a low quality to ensure fast download times), an similar example of an Adonis Blue is shown. Click on the thumbnail for a larger image.

The Trouble with Butterflies

This is where the real fun begins. I have quite a simple story to tell on this front, borne out of my (and others) experiences. You need to know the basics of apertures, shutter speeds and depth-of-field, but it goes like this:

  • Butterflies are constantly on the move. Using a tripod isn't practical because the critters don't stay still long enough. In order to avoid "camera shake" or (I guess) "butterfly shake", you need to set a fast shutter speed.

  • THIS REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF EXPOSURE.

  • Butterflies are small. In order to get a decent composition within the camera frame, you need to get close up.

  • Because you're close up, you need a large depth-of-field.

  • Because you need a large depth-of-field, you need to close the aperture down (given that the smaller the aperture, the greater the depth-of-field - this is something that many inexperienced photographers don't appreciate - but it's VERY IMPORTANT!!!).

  • THIS REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF EXPOSURE.

  • So I hope you can see the problem is that there isn't enough light (even half-decent sunshine may not be sufficient) to allow a fast shutter speed (to reduce shake) as well as a small aperture (to increase depth-of-field).

I use 2 solutions when attempting to address the problem of insufficient light. The first is to increase the light sensitivity of the camera by increasing the ISO rating. I typically use an ISO rating of 200, since higher ISO ratings tend to produce "grainier" pictures. I then set the camera to Shutter Priority (where I can set the shutter speed and get the camera to determine the aperture) and set a speed of 1/250 seconds. If the resulting shot has a wide aperture then I know that the depth-of-field will be comprimised and I then revert to the second solution.

This is to introduce artificial light through the use of a flash unit. With a flash unit I can increase the shutter speed and close down the aperture, and still get enough light to get the right exposure. Flash units introduce their own problems (such as "black backgrounds" and "unnatural shadows"), but I believe these are surmountable, and will write another article in the not-too-distant future to go over some of these pitfalls and how to overcome them.

2005 Highlight

The highlight of 2005 has already happened on the photography front as far as I'm concerned. This year, 4 of my photos are included in the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Butterfly and Moth Report for 2004. When I look at the other photographers that are included in the same report, I can only feel humbled that my photos are worthy of inclusion!

My Favourite Photo

I get asked this now and again, and it's the hardest question to answer since all photos capture so much more than the final image - the amount of preparation, the time it took to compose, the amount of "stalking" required and, of course, luck. If I had to provide an answer, it would be the photo of a mating pair of Black Hairstreak, because:

  • It took my 3 hours to get to the location (Monk's Wood in Cambridgeshire).

  • I'd never seen Black Hairstreak before.

  • I had no idea if I'd see Black Hairstreak at all.

  • I was at Monk's Wood for 5 hours before I got this shot.

  • I was about to leave the site when a family of Long-Tailed Tits flew into a Blackthorn bush and dislodged the mating pair that then settled, at head height, on a nearby bush.

  • It's possibly a sight that I'll never experience again in my lifetime.

So even though I have much better pictures than this (from a photographic point of view), this will always be a special "moment" as far as I'm concerned.

Top 5 Tips

There are 5 main thoughts in concluding this article.

  • Learn from others. I've learned so much about photography (and wildlife in general) from other people, that I'd encourage anyone interested in either topic (photography or wildlife) to get connected! Join Butterfly Conservation. Participate in field trips. Attend social events. The infrastructure is there!

  • Experiment. It took me at least a year to get to grips with my latest camera, and understand how to operate it properly. It was like owning a Ferrari (so I'm told!), but only being able to get it into 2nd gear. Time spent with the manual and photography books is time well spent. You need to understand the theory, and also the practical.

  • Be patient. Butterflies are not the easiest of subjects to work with. It has literally taken me years to build up a half-decent portfolio. Don't expect to get stunning shots every time, and be prepared to spend time researching your equipment, technique, target species and sites.

  • Know your subject. If you want to get a shot of a Purple Emperor, it's no good turning up in central London in November and looking in tube stations! Seriously - if you really do want to get a shot of a particular species, then you need to know its flight time and sites where it can be seen. You also need to understand its behaviour. There are many good books and websites around that can help you in this regard, including this website.

  • Never, ever, give up. I believe that the worst thing you can do is compare your pictures to those of others. You can certainly learn from them, but don't compare yourself with them. So much depends on equipment (and therefore money) and time, that comparisons are, quite frankly, suspect. I think you should only compare yourself with your own shots. Are you improving over time? I truly believe that I've yet to take my best picture, and that situation will never change. Which is why I can see this "hobby" lasting forever.



Site brought to you by Webified
Copyright © Peter Eeles 2002-2008
All rights are reserved
Administrator Login