Some Background
I've been interested in entomology (yes, moths and other
insects too!) from about the age of 8. That was, indeed, a very long
time ago. A childhood spent growing up in rural Gloucestershire, and the
plethora of wildlife that surrounded me, has clearly influenced the
lifelong fascination I've had with butterflies. Ever since I can
remember, there's always been a jam jar containing "something" in the
house every summer.
Even during my teenage years, when I was at my most
troublesome (according to my mum!), I still maintained an interest in
butterflies. And that interest has never waned. Even now, many years
later, married with 3 sons (the eldest is 18 this year!), I still have
the odd jam jar on the window sill ... and foodplants growing in the
garden (my wife is aware of some - but not all!) ... and "weeds" in
selected areas of the garden. They're all there for a reason.
Until relatively recently, I was never that "hooked" on
photography. I had a very old SLR that my dad bought for me for my 15th
birthday, together with a close-up adapter that fitted on the front of
the lens, but that was it. I remember using it to photograph the
commoner species, and still have photos taken with it, including
Orange-Tip, Puss Moth, Emperor Moth and the like.
The Move to Digital
My chosen career in computing ensured that I had no fear
of technology - although I appreciate some people do (and I still don't
know how to work the video recorder, but my 3 sons help me out on that
front). In 2002 I bought my first digital camera - an "Olympus 2040
Zoom" model. A whopping 2.1 megapixels resolution (non-digital SLRs
given about 11 megapixels resolution!). But within 2 days I was hooked.
The experience was so different from my old camera, for reasons that are
well-documented:
-
I saw my pictures instantly.
-
I could take as many pictures as I liked.
-
The overall quality of my pictures was better (because I
took more, and binned those that were rubbish!).
A number of the photos on this website are taken with
that camera, even though it would be considered "dated" and inferior by
today's standards. Since this website is "self-improving" (the best
contributions always take precedence), these will disappear over time.
Here's a photo of an Adonis Blue taken with this camera. Click on the
thumbnail for a larger image.

My First (and Current) Digital SLR
In 2004 I took a trip to the US and, attracted by the
exchange rate, decided to buy my first digital SLR - a Canon EOS 10D (6
megapixels). Although this model was superseded by the Canon EOS 20D in
late 2004, it's still a nice piece of kit and absolute bargains can be
found on eBay and
the like. I also bought a Sigma 100mm macro lens (which is superb) and
later purchased a Canon macro flash unit to complete the kit.
Just so that you can see the difference in quality
(although this is difficult on a website, where the images are
deliberately of a low quality to ensure fast download times), an similar
example of an Adonis Blue is shown. Click on the thumbnail for a larger
image.
.jpg)
The Trouble with Butterflies
This is where the real fun begins. I have quite a
simple story to tell on this front, borne out of my (and others)
experiences. You need to know the basics of apertures, shutter speeds
and depth-of-field, but it goes like this:
-
Butterflies are constantly on the move. Using a tripod
isn't practical because the critters don't stay still long enough. In
order to avoid "camera shake" or (I guess) "butterfly shake", you need to set a fast shutter speed.
-
THIS REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF EXPOSURE.
-
Butterflies are small. In order to get a decent
composition within the camera frame, you need to get close up.
-
Because you're close up, you need a large
depth-of-field.
-
Because you need a large depth-of-field, you need to
close the aperture down (given that the smaller the aperture, the
greater the depth-of-field - this is something that many inexperienced
photographers don't appreciate - but it's VERY IMPORTANT!!!).
-
THIS REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF EXPOSURE.
-
So I hope you can see the problem is that there isn't enough light (even
half-decent sunshine may not be sufficient) to allow a fast shutter
speed (to reduce shake) as well as a small aperture (to increase
depth-of-field).
I use 2 solutions when attempting to address the problem of insufficient light.
The first is to increase the light sensitivity of the camera by increasing the ISO rating. I typically
use an ISO rating of 200, since higher ISO ratings tend to produce "grainier" pictures. I then set
the camera to Shutter Priority (where I can set the shutter speed and get the camera to determine the
aperture) and set a speed of 1/250 seconds. If the resulting shot has a wide aperture then I know that
the depth-of-field will be comprimised and I then revert to the second solution.
This is to introduce artificial light through the use of a flash unit. With a flash unit
I can increase the shutter speed and close down the aperture, and still get enough light to
get the right exposure. Flash units introduce their own problems (such as "black backgrounds" and "unnatural shadows"), but I
believe these are surmountable, and will write another article in the
not-too-distant future to go over some of these pitfalls and how to
overcome them.
2005 Highlight
The highlight of 2005 has already happened on the
photography front as far as I'm concerned. This year, 4 of my photos are
included in the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Butterfly and Moth Report
for 2004. When I look at the other photographers that are included in
the same report, I can only feel humbled that my photos are worthy of
inclusion!
My Favourite Photo
I get asked this now and again, and it's the hardest question to
answer since all photos capture so much more than the final image - the
amount of preparation, the time it took to compose, the amount of
"stalking" required and, of course, luck. If I had to provide an answer,
it would be the photo of a mating pair of Black Hairstreak, because:
-
It took my 3 hours to get to the location (Monk's Wood
in Cambridgeshire).
-
I'd never seen Black Hairstreak before.
-
I had no idea if I'd see Black Hairstreak at all.
-
I was at Monk's Wood for 5 hours before I got this shot.
-
I was about to leave the site when a family of
Long-Tailed Tits flew into a Blackthorn bush and dislodged the mating
pair that then settled, at head height, on a nearby bush.
-
It's possibly a sight that I'll never experience again
in my lifetime.
.jpg)
So even though I have much better pictures than this
(from a photographic point of view), this will always be a special
"moment" as far as I'm concerned.
Top 5 Tips
There are 5 main thoughts in concluding this article.
-
Learn from others. I've learned so much about
photography (and wildlife in general) from other people, that I'd
encourage anyone interested in either topic (photography or wildlife) to
get connected! Join
Butterfly Conservation. Participate in
field trips.
Attend social events. The infrastructure is there!
-
Experiment. It took me at least a year to get to
grips with my latest camera, and understand how to operate it properly.
It was like owning a Ferrari (so I'm told!), but only being able to get
it into 2nd gear. Time spent with the manual and photography books is
time well spent. You need to understand the theory, and also the
practical.
-
Be patient. Butterflies are not the easiest of
subjects to work with. It has literally taken me years to build up a
half-decent portfolio. Don't expect to get stunning shots every time,
and be prepared to spend time researching your equipment, technique,
target species and sites.
-
Know your subject. If you want to get a shot of a
Purple Emperor, it's no good turning up in central London in November
and looking in tube stations! Seriously - if you really do want to get a
shot of a particular species, then you need to know its
flight time and
sites where it can be seen. You also
need to understand its behaviour. There are many good
books and
websites around that can help you in this regard, including this
website.
-
Never, ever, give up. I believe that the worst
thing you can do is compare your pictures to those of others. You can
certainly learn from them, but don't compare yourself with them. So much
depends on equipment (and therefore money) and time, that comparisons
are, quite frankly, suspect. I think you should only compare yourself
with your own shots. Are you improving over time? I truly believe that
I've yet to take my best picture, and that situation will never change.
Which is why I can see this "hobby" lasting forever.
Site brought to you by Webified
Copyright © Peter Eeles 2002-2008
All rights are reserved
Administrator Login